I personally feel that doctors live less number of years than non-doctors. One reason is professional hazards. The factors responsible are:
The stress level of doctor is much higher than the stress levels in non-doctors in other professions.
Stress level has increased in NCR since the introduction of the Consumer Protection Act.
The decision of Medical Council of India to suspend license on deficiency of service has also increased the stress in doctors. They always pray that if the patient has a complaint, he approaches the Consumer Court and not the Council.
Smoking and alcohol is not unknown in doctors.
Metabolic syndrome and pot belly obesity is again very common in doctors.
Diabetes and heart disease are also equally common.
Surprisingly, the incidence of coronary artery disease, angioplasty, stenting and bypass surgery in Cardiologists too is not less.
Doctors are more susceptible to hospital-acquired infection, tuberculosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV as professional hazards.


Despite not recommended by any international guideline, the commercial serological tests (which detect antibodies in the blood developed in response to Mycobacteria tuberculosis infection) continue to be used extensively especially tn the private health sector, with claims about accuracy often based on poor quality and grossly insufficient data. It is estimated that about 1.5 million TB suspects are subjected to serological tests every year in India at an estimated cost of 15 million USD. Results of several meta–analyses have indicated poor performance of these tests, and in 2008, an assessment by TDR (UN special programme for research and training in tropical diseases) found that none of the assays were good enough to replace conventional microbiological tests or as an add–on test to rule out tuberculosis. An updated systematic review commissioned by WHO and TDR in 2010 have re–confirmed these findings. A wrong diagnosis may mean that those with tuberculosis will not get needed therapy and may result in continued spread of the disease, or that those without tuberculosis may be subjected to possible side–effects from unnecessary treatment leading to wasted resources for the patient and consequent impact on livelihood. This has huge epiciemtological and socio–economic implications.

The WHO Expert Group and STAG–TB which reviewed this data concluded that currently available commercial serological tests provide inconsistent and imprecise estimates of sensitivity and specificity and strongly recommended that these tests should not be used for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extra–pulmonary TB (adults and children), irrespective of HIV status. On the basis of STAG–TB recommendation, WHO is due to release a negative policy — the first of its kind—on current commercial tuberculosis serodiagnostics though being cautious not to stifle research and innovation in this fteid as a more accurate serological test has the potential to become a ‘point of care’ test for diagnosing TB.

The National laboratory committee of RNTCP endorsed the WHO expert group recommendations and requested Central TB Division to disseminate the message to al! Stakeholders involved in TB control in India.